Data Governance should be considered what rather than what?

Data Governance should be considered a program rather than a project because it encompasses ongoing processes and establishes practices that require continuous improvement and adaptation. By viewing data governance as a program, organizations can focus on long-term strategic objectives, ensuring that data management efforts are aligned with business goals and integrated across various departments.

A program relates to a broader set of initiatives and is aimed at sustaining various ongoing activities, whereas a project has a defined lifespan with specific objectives and outcomes. Data governance involves multiple components such as policies, standards, and roles that must be maintained and evolved over time to adapt to changing needs and regulations. This ongoing nature highlights the importance of a holistic approach rather than treating it as a one-time effort.

In contrast, considering data governance as a project might lead to a lack of continuous focus, resource allocation, and commitment, resulting in incomplete implementation and oversight over data practices. Consequently, this perspective might inhibit the long-term effectiveness of data governance initiatives, making it crucial to acknowledge it as an enduring program.